Abstract

A key need in cognitive training interventions is to personalize task difficulty to each user and to adapt this difficulty to continually apply appropriate challenges as users improve their skill to perform the tasks. Here we examine how Bayesian filtering approaches, such as hidden Markov models and Kalman filters, and deep-learning approaches, such as the long short-term memory (LSTM) model, may be useful methods to estimate user skill level and predict appropriate task challenges. A possible advantage of these models over commonly used adaptive methods, such as staircases or blockwise adjustment methods that are based only upon recent performance, is that Bayesian filtering and deep learning approaches can model the trajectory of user performance across multiple sessions and incorporate data from multiple users to optimize local estimates. As a proof of concept, we fit data from two large cohorts of undergraduate students performing WM training using an N-back task. Results show that all three models predict appropriate challenges for different users. However, the hidden Markov models were most accurate in predicting participants' performances as a function of provided challenges, and thus, they placed participants at appropriate future challenges. These data provide good support for the potential of machine learning approaches as appropriate methods to personalize task performance to users in tasks that require adaptively determined challenges.

Highlights

  • Over the last decade, the scientific topic of improving cognitive capacity by leveraging the plasticity of the brain has gathered both significant interest and controversies regarding effectiveness (Karbach and Unger, 2014; Au et al, 2016; Melby-Lervåg et al, 2016; Simons et al, 2016; Green et al, 2018; Soveri et al, 2018; Redick, 2019)

  • Machine Learning Tracks Cognitive Challenge outcomes; this might be because training trajectories are very diverse across participants, giving rise to the possibility that standard adaptive procedures may not provide the optimal challenge to all participants

  • The N-back task (Pergher et al, 2019), which we study here, has been used widely to ameliorate cognitive declines in populations ranging from children with ADHD (Rutledge et al, 2012) to older adults with cognitive declines (Stepankova Georgi et al, 2013), performance on the N-back ranges largely both within and across studies, as do the methods of adaptively adjusting task challenges to participants’ abilities (Pergher et al, 2019)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The scientific topic of improving cognitive capacity by leveraging the plasticity of the brain has gathered both significant interest and controversies regarding effectiveness (Karbach and Unger, 2014; Au et al, 2016; Melby-Lervåg et al, 2016; Simons et al, 2016; Green et al, 2018; Soveri et al, 2018; Redick, 2019). The N-back task (Pergher et al, 2019), which we study here, has been used widely to ameliorate cognitive declines in populations ranging from children with ADHD (Rutledge et al, 2012) to older adults with cognitive declines (Stepankova Georgi et al, 2013), performance on the N-back ranges largely both within and across studies, as do the methods of adaptively adjusting task challenges to participants’ abilities (Pergher et al, 2019). A step in the right direction is to develop a system that could predict a participant’s performance and use this information to determine the challenge, with an overall goal to improve the participant’s cognitive functions

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call