Abstract
Distress management is of particular importance in all disease treatment strategies that aim to cope with medical conditions, which require prolonged therapy. Here, we present results obtained in a comparative study of various classification methods for automated distress detection. For the purposes of the present study, use was made of a common experimental protocol that relies on a dataset of approximately 6 000 oncological patients at different stages of therapy. The dataset consists of the binary responses to specific questions in a purposefully-designed self-evaluation questionnaire on the degree of distress. Conducted, within such a framework, was a performance assessment of three distress detectors based on Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network (MLP NN), boosting and bagging meta-classification methods and evaluated, further, was the performance of nine characteristic descriptors (KR1-KR9) representing the informative content of the dataset in different ways. The results obtained in the experiments prove conclusively that one of the characteristic descriptors, KR8 and KR9, significantly outperform the other descriptors in terms of classification accuracy, precision, recall, and F-measure.
Highlights
The development of information technologies and data storage in clinical psychological diagnostics prove to be extremely beneficial for tracing patients with oncological diseases, based on the use of psychological tests
Within such a framework, was a performance assessment of three distress detectors based on Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network (MLP Neural network (NN)), boosting and bagging meta-classification methods and evaluated, further, was the performance of nine characteristic descriptors (KR1-KR9) representing the informative content of the dataset in different ways
The algorithms used for the study are Boosting, Bagging, and MLP NN
Summary
The development of information technologies and data storage in clinical psychological diagnostics prove to be extremely beneficial for tracing patients with oncological diseases, based on the use of psychological tests. It is recommended to apply tests to find ways and screening tools to provide the necessary interventions according to the specific needs of the patient. Distress is a base factor influencing the clinical and mental state of cancer patients. The "Screening Tool for Measurement of Distress“ (Riba, Michelle B. et al, 2019; Власаков, В., и колектив 2015) is an extensive approach and a rapid method of identifying more accurately the mental health of patients with tumours, assessing the individual and psychosocial needs through a validated questionnaire that seem more appropriate for determining the level and factors of distress (Riba, Michelle B. et al, 2019). Recognizing the importance of addressing the emotional and social concerns of oncology patients, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) strongly recommends distress screening and management as a standard of care within oncology health services delivery
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: ANNUAL JOURNAL OF TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF VARNA, BULGARIA
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.