Abstract

"For the detection of the flat foot and ligament laxity, the method of visual observation of the anatomical landmarks, the planogram on paper and the test of bearing body weight were used. At the same time, to test the stability of the ankle joint, we used the unipodal test on Bosu ball, where it was measured in seconds how much the subjects managed to maintain the unipodal position on Bosu ball. For the detection of low back pain, the method of individual interviewing of each athlete, the VAS scale of pain, the DLLT test (Double Leg Lowering Test) and the visual evaluation of any malalignments present in the bone structures was used. Applying the protocol for flat foot pathology, we obtained an improvement of the plantar arch in all subjects, as evidenced by the improvement of paper planograms where the decrease of the plantar footprint on the medial part of the foot was observed in all subjects of the experiment group. Compared to the standard protocol applied to the control group, we obtained by applying our protocol an improvement of the Achilles tendon line in orthostatic in 9 out of 10 subjects, while when applying the standard protocol, only 7 out of 10 subjects were observed. In conclusion, applying the kinetic protocol to recover post-training low back pain has improved low back pain, proving to be more beneficial than the standardized protocol for dancers, especially for female subjects. Keywords: kinetic recovery, sport performance, dancers pathologies, sport traumatology "

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call