Abstract
This paper outlines the human error identification techniques currently existent to assess and analyze the risk and human error. Even if many formal error identification techniques have existed for years, none could be validated for use to every different domain. This study considers lots of possible error modes that include external error modes, internal error modes, performance shaping factors and psychological error mechanisms, and integrates a number of execution procedures of human error identification techniques, including task analysis, criticality analysis and reliability analysis, to assess the latent human error and hazard risk in a case plant. It is concluded that the integrated method is a valuable aid to develop much safer operational processes and can be used to predict human error rates of critical tasks in the plant.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
