Abstract

Growing demands for green and sustainable processing that eliminates the utilization of toxic chemicals and increases efficiency has encouraged the application of novel extraction technologies for the food industry. This review discusses the principles and potential application of several green technology for gelatin extraction. Several novel technologies and their processing efficiency are discussed in this review. Furthermore, factors that affect the quality of the gelatin produced from different sources are also highlighted. The potential application of ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), subcritical water extraction, high-pressure processing, and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) to improve gelatin extraction are addressed. These technologies have the potential to become an efficient extraction method compared to the conventional extraction technologies. Several combinations of green and conventional technologies have been reported to yield promising results. These combinations, especially using conventional pre-treatment and green technologies for extraction, have been found to be more effective in producing gelatin. Since gelatin could be produced from various sources, it exhibits different characteristics; thus, different approaches and extraction method should be identified for specific types of gelatin. Although these technologies have limitations, such as overhydration and sophisticated systems explicitly designed for large-scale production, they are nonetheless more efficient in the long run to safeguard the environment as they reduce solvent usage and carbon footprint along the way.

Highlights

  • Type A gelatin has a broader distribution of molecular weight fractions, with

  • Shows2the process process flow of a typical gelatin extraction process. New technologies such as ultrasound, flow of a typical gelatin extraction process. New technologies such as ultrasound, subcritsubcritical water extraction, high-pressure processing, and microwave are assist ical water extraction, high-pressure processing, and microwave are used toused assisttoduring during the pre-treatment or extraction stages, or both

  • A similar study by Ahmad et al (2018) [23] on gelatin extraction from bovine skin found that the gelatin extracted using ultrasound (53 kHz and 500 W) at 60 ◦ C for 6 h with bromelain pre-treatment produces a higher yield and exhibits better quality compared to bovine skin treated without enzyme and ultrasound

Read more

Summary

A Review

Nor Qhairul Izzreen Mohd Noor 1 , Rina Syafinaz Razali 1 , Nur Khairina Ismail 1 , Rabiatul Amirah Ramli 1 , Umi Hartina Mohamad Razali 1,2, *, Ahmad Riduan Bahauddin 1 , Nazikussabah Zaharudin 3 , Ashari Rozzamri 4 , Jamilah Bakar 4 and Sharifudin Md. Shaarani 5. Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affil-

Introduction
Gelatin
Gelatin Extraction
Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction
Principle
Extraction of Gelatin Using Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction
Subcritical Water Extraction
High-Pressure Processing
Diagram
High-Pressure
Extraction of Gelatin Using HPP
Microwave-Assisted Extraction
Extraction of Gelatin Using MAE
Major Findings
Challenges and Future Perspectives
Limitations
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.