Abstract

Traveltime is one of the propagating wave’s components. As the wave propagates further, the traveltime increases. It can be computed by solving wave equation of the ray path or the eikonal wave equation. Accurate method of computing traveltimes will give a significant impact on enhancing the output of seismic forward modeling and migration. In seismic forward modeling, computation of the wave’s traveltime locally by ray tracing method leads to low resolution of the resulting seismic image, especially when the subsurface is having a complex geology. However, computing the wave’s traveltime with a gridding scheme by finite difference methods able to overcomes the problem. This paper aims to discuss the ability of ray tracing and fast marching method of finite difference in obtaining a seismic image that have more similarity with its subsurface model. We illustrated the results of the traveltime computation by both methods in form of ray path projection and wavefront. We employed these methods in forward modeling and compared both resulting seismic images. Seismic migration is executed as a part of quality control (QC). We used a synthetic velocity model which based on a part of Malay Basin geology structure. Our findings shows that the seismic images produced by the application of fast marching finite difference method has better resolution than ray tracing method especially on deeper part of subsurface model.

Highlights

  • Seismic reflection data in the seismogram are acquired from the responses of the seismic wave

  • In seismology field for example, an accurate seismic traveltimes prediction method is necessary for their reflection processing, pinpointing earthquake source location and seismic tomography (Rawlinson & Sambridge, 2005) including the processing of seismic reflection profiles, earthquake location, and seismic tomography at a variety of scales

  • We present two seismic applications of a recently developed grid-based numerical scheme for tracking the evolution of monotonically advancing interfaces, via finite-difference solution of the eikonal equation, known as the fast marching method (FMM)

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Seismic reflection data in the seismogram are acquired from the responses of the seismic wave. Two main approaches that can be used to calculate the seismic wave traveltimes from source to the receiver, which are the traditional ray tracing method and finite difference approximation to the eikonal equation (Perez & Bancroft, 2001; Alkhalifah & Fomel, 2010; Alashloo & Ghosh, 2017). We discussed on the reliability of ray tracing method and fast marching method of finite difference eikonal solver applications towards calculating traveltimes of propagating seismic waves in the forward modeling. Instead of calculating wave propagation locally as in ray tracing, finite difference offers to solve the eikonal equation over the whole earth model by dividing the velocity field into gridding scheme. Forward modeling is done to obtain seismic image from different modeling procedure which is using the finite difference and ray tracing

15 Hz Ricker
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call