Abstract

Rock mass quality evaluation is a challenging task in geotechnical investigations given the natural heterogeneity and the limited data. These investigations mainly depend on the traditional drilling tests. However, such tests are expensive and time consuming, provide point measurements, and cannot be conducted in steep topographic areas, and thus cause uncertainties in the geological model. Conversely, geophysical methods such as electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) are non-invasive, user-friendly, and fast. In this work, we establish empirical correlation between ERT and limited drilling data to obtain rock mass integrity coefficient (Kv). The estimated Kv provides 2D/3D imaging of the rock mass quality evaluation via weathered/unweathered rock and faults detection in order to cover the entire area even where no drilling test exists. Compared with the past geotechnical investigations, our work reduce the ambiguities caused by the inadequate well tests and provide more accurate geological model for infrastructures design. Our work proposes that, in case of sparse borehole data, the established empirical equations can be used to determine Kv along different geophysical profiles via 2D/3D insight of the subsurface. Our approach is applicable in any hard rock setting, and the established correlations can be used in areas even where no well test exists.

Highlights

  • Rock mass quality evaluation is a challenging task in geotechnical investigations given the natural heterogeneity and the limited data

  • We propose that only the certain essential locations of the study area could be selected for drilling tests, while geophysical survey such as electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) would be performed to cover the entire project site

  • The results reveal that ERT and Kv models do not match perfectly with each other, which suggests that Kv provides more accuracy than ERT for rock mass quality evaluation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rock mass quality evaluation is a challenging task in geotechnical investigations given the natural heterogeneity and the limited data These investigations mainly depend on the traditional drilling tests. Rock mass integrity coefficient (Kv), rock quality designation (RQD), volume joint number of rock mass (JV) and average joint spacing (dP) are the main geotechnical indices to determine general stability of the subsurface rock ­mass[10,11,12,13,14,15] These parameters are widely used to classify the bearing strength of the engineering rock ­mass[16]. The borehole tests provide limited coverage of the vertical measurements along some specific points only, cannot evaluate the subsurface laterally, and are hardly conducted in the steep topographic ­areas[2,17] Such approaches are costly and time consuming, and require more ­equipment[18]. At present, ERT is one of the leading geophysical methods in geotechnical research

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call