Abstract

It has been a big challenge to distinguish synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (sMPLC) from primary lung cancer with intrapulmonary metastases (IPM). We aimed to assess the clinical application of dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with multiple lung cancer nodules. We enrolled patients with multiple pulmonary nodules who had undergone dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT and divided them into sMPLC and IPM groups based on comprehensive features. The SUVmax, fitted Ki value based on dynamic scanning, and corresponding maximum diameter (Dmax) from the two largest tumors were determined in each patient. We determined the absolute between-tumor difference of SUVmax/Dmax and Ki/Dmax (ΔSUVmax/Dmax; ΔKi/Dmax) and assessed the between-group differences. Further, the diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by ROC analysis and the correlation between ΔSUVmax/Dmax and ΔKi/Dmax from all groups was determined. There was no significant difference for ΔSUVmax/Dmax between the IPM and sMPLC groups, while the IPM group had a significantly higher ΔKi/Dmax than the sMPLC group. The AUC of ΔKi/Dmax for differentiating sMPLC from IPM was 0.80 (cut-off value of Ki = 0.0059, sensitivity 79%, specificity 75%, p < 0.001). There was a good correlation (Pearson r = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.79-0.96, p < 0.0001) between ΔSUVmax/Dmax and ΔKi/Dmax in the IPM group but not in the sMPLC group (Pearson r = 0.45, p > 0.05). Dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT could be a useful tool for distinguishing sMPLC from IPM. Ki calculation based on Patlak graphic analysis could be more sensitive than SUVmax in discriminating IPM from sMPLC in patients with multiple lung cancer nodules.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.