Abstract

Temporal variability of NO2 concentrations measured by 28 Envirowatch E-MOTEs, 13 AQMesh pods, and eight reference sensors (five run by Sheffield City Council and three run by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)) was analysed at different time scales (e.g., annual, weekly and diurnal cycles). Density plots and time variation plots were used to compare the distributions and temporal variability of NO2 concentrations. Long-term trends, both adjusted and non-adjusted, showed significant reductions in NO2 concentrations. At the Tinsley site, the non-adjusted trend was −0.94 (−1.12, −0.78) µgm−3/year, whereas the adjusted trend was −0.95 (−1.04, −0.86) µgm−3/year. At Devonshire Green, the non-adjusted trend was −1.21 (−1.91, −0.41) µgm−3/year and the adjusted trend was −1.26 (−1.57, −0.83) µgm−3/year. Furthermore, NO2 concentrations were analysed employing univariate linear and nonlinear time series models and their performance was compared with a more advanced time series model using two exogenous variables (NO and O3). For this purpose, time series data of NO, O3 and NO2 were obtained from a reference site in Sheffield, which were more accurate than the measurements from low-cost sensors and, therefore, more suitable for training and testing the model. In this article, the three main steps used for model development are discussed: (i) model specification for choosing appropriate values for p, d and q, (ii) model fitting (parameters estimation), and (iii) model diagnostic (testing the goodness of fit). The linear auto-regressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) performed better than the nonlinear counterpart; however, its performance in predicting NO2 concentration was inferior to ARIMA with exogenous variables (ARIMAX). Using cross-validation ARIMAX demonstrated strong association with the measured concentrations, with a correlation coefficient of 0.84 and RMSE of 9.90. ARIMAX can be used as an early warning tool for predicting potential pollution episodes in order to be proactive in adopting precautionary measures.

Highlights

  • Air pollution is one of the most serious environmental threats to health, killing 6.4 million people in 2015 worldwide both in developed and less-wealthy nations [1]

  • Various statistical metrics calculated for the fitted model and cross validation were significantly improved as compared to auto-regressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model

  • We have a network of air quality monitoring stations (AQMSs) in Sheffield consisting of low-cost and reference sensors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Air pollution is one of the most serious environmental threats to health, killing 6.4 million people in 2015 worldwide both in developed and less-wealthy nations [1]. 2.8 million deaths were caused by indoor air pollution and 4.2 million deaths by outdoor air pollution. Air pollution is causing various health problems including respiratory problems, cardiovascular diseases, lung cancer and asthma [2]. Walters and Ayres [3] have reported that air pollution, especially particulate matter and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) pollution, may cause premature deaths and hospital admissions for conditions such as cardiovascular problems, allergic reactions and lung cancer. It is reported that exposure to air pollution is harmful for children, people with existing health problems and the elderly [4,5,6]. Air pollution may reduce visibility, damage historical buildings and monuments, affect vegetation and reduce crop yield and quality [4,5,6,7]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call