Abstract

As one of the main payloads mounted on the Yutu-2 rover of Chang’E-4 probe, lunar penetrating radar (LPR) aims to map the subsurface structure in the Von Kármán crater. The field LPR data are generally masked by clutters and noises of large quantities. To solve the noise interference, dozens of filtering methods have been applied to LPR data. However, these methods have their limitations, so noise suppression is still a tough issue worth studying. In this article, the denoising convolutional neural network (CNN) framework is applied to the noise suppression and weak signal extraction of 500 MHz LPR data. The results verify that the low-frequency clutters embedded in the LPR data mainly came from the instrument system of the Yutu rover. Besides, compared with the classic band-pass filter and the mean filter, the CNN filter has better performance when dealing with noise interference and weak signal extraction; compared with Kirchhoff migration, it can provide original high-quality radargram with diffraction information. Based on the high-quality radargram provided by the CNN filter, the subsurface sandwich structure is revealed and the weak signals from three sub-layers within the paleo-regolith are extracted.

Highlights

  • Based on the high-quality radargram provided by the convolutional neural network (CNN) filter, the subsurface sandwich structure is revealed and the weak signals from three sub-layers within the paleo-regolith are extracted

  • The results presented by the CNN filter are cleaner than that of the combined method

  • The low-frequency clutter extracted from CE-3 lunar penetrating radar (LPR) data using the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) method is applied to the training of CNN

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Many filtering methods have been applied to LPR data, such as band-pass filtering [34], bi-dimensional empirical mode decomposition (BDEMD) [35], complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition (CEEMD) [36], mathematical morphology filtering [37], and variational mode decomposition (VMD) [38] These methods have their limitations and cannot provide a satisfactory result. Based on the well trained CNN filter, the low-frequency clutters and high-frequency noises are both suppressed in the field LPR profile and the weak signals in the deep are extracted. Based on the high-quality radargram provided by the CNN filter, the subsurface sandwich structure is revealed and the weak signals from three sub-layers within the paleo-regolith are extracted

The Initial CH-2B LPR Data
Methodology of Denoising CNN
The framework of denoising convolutional neural network
CNN Training shown as follow
CNN Training
The comparison of radar profiles with parameter αradargram
Model Denoising Test
Denoising and Weak
12. Result
TheInSubsurface
Detailed and Quantitative Comparisons of Filtering Methods
Why the CNN
Mean integral relativeerror errorcomparison comparison of results in Figure
Conclusions
Background removal
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.