Abstract
This study proposes to analyze the differences in learning outcomes of pupils, who learn cooperative learning models of group investigation and conventional learning. The research sample consisted of class Xa (30 people) who learned the cooperative learning model of the group investigation model and class Xb (30 people) taught using conventional learning models with the topic of learning is basic electronic (capacitors). The sampling technique uses random sampling with a non-equivalent control group design. Data collection techniques consisted of written tests, observation sheets and documentation. Meanwhile, research instrument used achievement test (objective criteria) in the form of multiple-choice questions that comprise as many as 25 of the given level (C1), understanding (C2) applying (C3) and analyzed. Students' test results were analyzed using descriptive statistical data analysis and inferential statistical data analysis. The analysis results obtained that there is a difference of learning outcomes between the experimental class and a control class with an average of 80.8 to 69.6 for the control class and experimental class. From the analysis, it was found that there was no significant difference between the experimental and control classes based on the N-gain value. So it can be concluded that the group investigation learning model does not have a significant effect on improving student learning outcomes.
Highlights
One of the obstacles faced by the world of knowledge is a subject of the weakness of the learning process
Schools directly linked to teaching and learning activities are needed to increase the efficiency of the learning process, both from equipment, services and human resources, in order to enhance the quality of the learning process and to produce qualified, successful vocational graduates
The lowest and highest values were founded in the two classes, namely the experimental class and the control class
Summary
One of the obstacles faced by the world of knowledge is a subject of the weakness of the learning process. When students graduate from school, they do not have high creativity and innovation. In reality, this happens to all subjects that use conventional teaching of the same item [5]. The low quality of education can be interpreted as a lack of success in the learning process [6]. Successful learning is characterized by an Universal Journal of Educational Research 8(10): 4618-4627, 2020 increase in student understanding for each subject. Schools directly linked to teaching and learning activities are needed to increase the efficiency of the learning process, both from equipment, services and human resources, in order to enhance the quality of the learning process and to produce qualified, successful vocational graduates
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have