Abstract

Since the establishment of blown sand physics, surface roughness has been widely used in current research to indicate the ability of a surface to resist wind erosion and to evaluate the windproof effect of protective measures. However, since the calculation of surface roughness can result in different values and its applicability is poor, there are disadvantages to its use. Therefore, it is proposed that the boundary layer displacement thickness should be used rather than roughness as an indicator to solve such problems. To analyze the new indicator’s accuracy and applicability when evaluating the effect of protective measures, a wind tunnel simulation experiment on a typical mechanical protection measure commonly used for sand control in China was conducted. Indicators of roughness and boundary layer displacement thickness were compared in evaluating the windproof performance of a Salix psammophila sand barrier of differing heights, side lengths, and porosities. The wind speed acceleration rate and effective protection area, which can directly reflect the protective effect of a sand barrier, were analyzed as evaluation criteria. The results show that roughness can only reflect the influence of height on the windbreak effect of sand barriers, whereas the boundary layer displacement thickness accurately showed the influence of height, side length, and porosity on the windproof effect of the sand barriers. Compared with roughness, the boundary layer displacement thickness was more strongly correlated with the effective protection area. Therefore, the boundary layer displacement thickness, rather than roughness, should be used as a new indicator when evaluating the windproof effect of protective measures.

Highlights

  • The interaction between airflow and the surface is crucial for understanding the generation of wind erosion and the transport of sand [1,2]

  • The influence height on various the sandspecifications barrier showed thatSalix the wind speed acceleration rateAssessment decreased of the influence of height on the sand barrier showed that the wind speed acceleration rate decreased with increased height

  • The surface roughness and boundary layer displacement thickness were calculated to evaluate the windproof effect of the sand barrier at different heights, side lengths, and porosities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The interaction between airflow and the surface is crucial for understanding the generation of wind erosion and the transport of sand [1,2]. Existing research uses many indicators, such as the friction coefficient, the drag coefficient, and surface roughness, to characterize the influence of surface roughness on airflow through field observations and wind tunnel simulations [3,4,5]. Surface roughness is the parameter most widely used to characterize the aerodynamic characteristics of various underlying surfaces since it is highly sensitive to differences in the fundamental properties of such surfaces [6,7,8]. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 592; doi:10.3390/ijerph16040592 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call