Abstract

Objective To explore the clinical application of blood return by tee union among central venous catheter (CVC) in hemodialysis patients. Methods A total of 90 MHD patients had been selected and randomly divided into group A (opening blood return), group B (closing blood return), and group C (blood return by tee union) on average from August 2013 to July 2014 in Hemodialysis Center. We documented the length of blood return, the volume of 0.9% sodium chloride solution, red-cell count (RCC)in the residual liquid after dialysis, the change of C reactive protein at the beginning of treatment, 6 months and 12 months after treatment, and the rate of CVC relative infection (CVC-RI) among three groups. Results The length of blood return were (291.04±46.92), (340.75±51.36), (278.99±45.21)s in A, B, C group, the volume of 0.9% sodium chloride solution (186.72±27.65), (257.24±40.07), (191.11±32.53) ml, the number of RCC in the residual liquid after dialysis (4 628.4±501.6), (5 104.5±592.7), (4 588.2±546.9)/μl (F=3.932 7, 4.529 1, 3.133 8; P 0.05), but the length of blood return in these two groups were shorter than that of group B (P 0.05). The incidence rate of CVC-RI were 40.00%, 16.67%, 13.33% in group A, B and C (χ2=7.080 7, P 0.05). Conclusions The CVC in hemodialysis patients utilized tee union for blood return which is simple, organized, saving time and labor, and reduced the potential risk of CVC-RI, slight infection symptom and the volume of sodium chloride solution. Key words: Hemodialysis; Central venous catheter; Central venous catheter relative infection; Blood return by tee union

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call