Abstract
To compare the advantages and disadvantages of biodegradable and non-degradable implants in orthopedic fractures. Recent original articles about biodegradable and non-degradable implants for fracture fixation were reviewed extensively, and a comprehensive retrospective analysis was performed. Standard orthopedic treatment is to use non-degradable metal implants to fixate the fracture site. This kind of treatment not only causes rejection and stress shielding, but also requires a second surgery to remove the metal implants. In addition, this kind of treatment increases physical pain and is a serious financial burden to patients. However, biodegradable implants do not require a second surgery for removal and have good biocompatibility and osteoconductivity. Biodegradable implants do not require a second surgery for removal and have good biocompatibility and osteoconductivity. Consequently, they are an ideal treatment and are increasingly used for orthopedic surgical patients. The most common indications for biodegradable implants include craniofacial reconstruction, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, meniscus repair, ankle fracture treatment, and tibia and fibula fracture treatment.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
