Abstract
Objetivo: Bio-Oss is a xenogene bone graft in which all organic components are removed while retaining their natural mineral architecture. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate, through a literature review, the benefits of using Bio-Oss for tissue regenerative treatment prior to implant placement. Material and Methods: a search was performed in Pubmed (Medline) in order to identify articles published in English between January 1, 2000 and June 31, 2018, where the Bio-Oss graft was used prior to implantation of implants in humans. A total of 40 studies were selected for detailed analysis. From this analysis, 18 articles were identified for inclusion in this review. Results: the articles analyzed in the review showed several beneficial effects of this xenograft, such as: positive osteoconductive properties, recovery of bone heights at sites with severe atrophies, slow xenograft reabsorption suggesting long term stability, survival rates and success of implants placed in grafted sites ranging from 91 to 100% in several studies. Conclusion: the use of bio-oss as a bone substitute is a viable alternative in the placement before dental implants, being used in clinical practice and with proved efficacy in several studies, due to its similarity with the bone and its high level of osteoconductivity.KeywordsBio-Oss; Bone Graft; Implants.
Highlights
O ne of the dentist’s challenges in surgical clinical practice, is to deal with bone reconstruction that comes after trauma, infection, neoplasies or periodontal disease [1]
Investigate the histological patterns and implant survival rates 5 years after maxillary sinus grafting with bovine inorganic bone graft (Bio-Oss) and Bio-Oss with autogenous bone with 1/1 proportion
Compare clinical and histological features after maxillary sinus grafting with biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP, Straumann BoneCeramic), inorganic bovine bone (ABB,Bio-Oss, Geistlich), trabeculed mineralized bone graft
Summary
O ne of the dentist’s challenges in surgical clinical practice, is to deal with bone reconstruction that comes after trauma, infection, neoplasies or periodontal disease [1]. Its predictability is the main choosing fator, concerning that is the only one that offers to the receiver site, cells with growth factors and with bone neoformation properties [8] Their disadvantages are associated to a higher post operative morbidity, donor site availability, unforseen graft resorption, and many times, the need of extraoral harvesting sites. A search into PubMed (MEDLINE) was made in order to identify scientific articles in english, published between January 1st, 2000 to 31st of june 2018, where the use of Bio-Oss used previouly to implant placement was performed. After title and abstract critical reading, some studies were excluded because they found to be incompatible to the objective of this study, and 40 articles were selected to a detailed analysis. 262 articles Published between January 1st, 2000 to 31st of june 2018, where the use of Bio-Oss
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
