Abstract

Cartilage grafts generated using conventional static tissue engineering strategies are characterised by low cell viability, suboptimal hyaline cartilage formation and, critically, inferior mechanical competency, which limit their application for resurfacing articular cartilage defects. To address the limitations of conventional static cartilage bioengineering strategies and generate robust, scaffold-free neocartilage grafts of human articular chondrocytes, the present study utilised custom-built microfluidic perfusion bioreactors with integrated ultrasound standing wave traps. The system employed sweeping acoustic drive frequencies over the range of 890 to 910 kHz and continuous perfusion of the chondrogenic culture medium at a low-shear flow rate to promote the generation of three-dimensional agglomerates of human articular chondrocytes, and enhance cartilage formation by cells of the agglomerates via improved mechanical stimulation and mass transfer rates. Histological examination and assessment of micromechanical properties using indentation-type atomic force microscopy confirmed that the neocartilage grafts were analogous to native hyaline cartilage. Furthermore, in the ex vivo organ culture partial thickness cartilage defect model, implantation of the neocartilage grafts into defects for 16 weeks resulted in the formation of hyaline cartilage-like repair tissue that adhered to the host cartilage and contributed to significant improvements to the tissue architecture within the defects, compared to the empty defects. The study has demonstrated the first successful application of the acoustofluidic perfusion bioreactors to bioengineer scaffold-free neocartilage grafts of human articular chondrocytes that have the potential for subsequent use in second generation autologous chondrocyte implantation procedures for the repair of partial thickness cartilage defects.

Highlights

  • Cartilage grafts generated using conventional static tissue engineering strategies are characterised by low cell viability, suboptimal hyaline cartilage formation and, critically, inferior mechanical competency, which limit their application for resurfacing articular cartilage defects

  • Attempts to improve the outcomes of cell-based transplantation methods, such as autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), have focused on the application of autologous chondrocytes seeded onto collagen scaffolds, in matrix-induced ACI, and three-dimensional (3-D) cartilaginous constructs, in second (II) generation ACI, for the repair of articular cartilage defects.[3,4,5]

  • Histological examination of the sections revealed hyaline cartilage-like tissue composed of numerous chondrocytes within lacunae embedded in dense extracellular matrix constituted by proteoglycans and collagen, which were stained with Alcian blue and Sirius red, respectively (Fig. 2c, d, o, p)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cartilage grafts generated using conventional static tissue engineering strategies are characterised by low cell viability, suboptimal hyaline cartilage formation and, critically, inferior mechanical competency, which limit their application for resurfacing articular cartilage defects. Surgical interventions for functional restoration of articular cartilage defects include reparative bone marrow stimulation techniques such as abrasion arthroplasty, drilling, microfracture, and restorative approaches such as autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), osteochondral auto/ allografts, periosteal/perichondral grafts.[2] these interventions provide symptomatic relief and improve joint function temporarily, to date, no technique has been completely successful in restoring/regenerating damaged articular cartilage to its native state. This is because the repair tissue that is generated is often fibrocartilaginous in nature, and lacks the mechanical competency of hyaline articular cartilage. The successful application of biomaterials in tissue engineering, including cartilage bioengineering, requires careful consideration of their 3-D architecture, biofunctionality, biocompatibility, biomechanics, degradation rates and immunogenicity of the degradation products.[8,9]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.