Abstract
Objective To clarify the value of absorbable barbed suture in closure of galeal. Methods A total of 101 patients had craniotomy treated in Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University from October 2018 to February 2019 were divided into two groups according to the admission date. In the barbed suture group, 45 patients were sutured with QUILL by continuous stitching. In the control group, 56 patients were sutured with traditional stitchingby intermittent suture. Compare the differences in suture speed, average postoperative hospital stay, incision complication rate, and the average hospital costs of the two groups. Results The suture speed in barbed suture group was (0.330 ± 0.012) cm/min, and was significantly faster than that in control group (0.540 ± 0.016) cm/min; the postoperative average hospitalization days in barbed suture group was (10.91 ± 0.62) d, and was significantly shorter than that in control group (12.73 ± 0.41) d, there were significant differences (P 0.05). Conclusions The use of absorbable barbed close epicranial aponeuroisiscan improve suture speed, shorten the postoperative average hospitalization days, which is worthy of promotion. Key words: Absorbable barbed suture; Subgaleal; Continuous stitching; Neurosurgery; Complications
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
