Abstract
Application of sequential analysis may avoid unnecessary experimentation and achieve economical use of available biomaterial stored in biological banks. When, as often happens in cohort case-control studies, cases are scarce, it may be possible to use multiple control observations per case to increase the power of a test for detecting differences between cases and controls. Samples from a biological data bank were analysed. We compared results of a non-sequential analysis with results of sequential t-tests for I to 5 controls matched per case in a cohort nested case-control study. Simulations are performed to get an idea of the unreliability and the power of the sequential test. In general the sequential t-tests are too conservative with respect to the achieved power. Average sample numbers are lower for the sequential tests and decrease with multiple controls. More than 3 or 4 controls per case does not give a meaningful increase in efficiency.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.