Abstract

BackgroundCompressed sensing is a novel signal compression technique in which signal is compressed while sensing. The compressed signal is recovered with the only few numbers of observations compared to conventional Shannon–Nyquist sampling, and thus reduces the storage requirements. In this study, we have proposed the 1-D discrete wavelet transform (DWT) based sensing matrices for speech signal compression. The present study investigates the performance analysis of the different DWT based sensing matrices such as: Daubechies, Coiflets, Symlets, Battle, Beylkin and Vaidyanathan wavelet families.ResultsFirst, we have proposed the Daubechies wavelet family based sensing matrices. The experimental result indicates that the db10 wavelet based sensing matrix exhibits the better performance compared to other Daubechies wavelet based sensing matrices. Second, we have proposed the Coiflets wavelet family based sensing matrices. The result shows that the coif5 wavelet based sensing matrix exhibits the best performance. Third, we have proposed the sensing matrices based on Symlets wavelet family. The result indicates that the sym9 wavelet based sensing matrix demonstrates the less reconstruction time and the less relative error, and thus exhibits the good performance compared to other Symlets wavelet based sensing matrices. Next, we have proposed the DWT based sensing matrices using the Battle, Beylkin and the Vaidyanathan wavelet families. The Beylkin wavelet based sensing matrix demonstrates the less reconstruction time and relative error, and thus exhibits the good performance compared to the Battle and the Vaidyanathan wavelet based sensing matrices. Further, an attempt was made to find out the best-proposed DWT based sensing matrix, and the result reveals that sym9 wavelet based sensing matrix shows the better performance among all other proposed matrices. Subsequently, the study demonstrates the performance analysis of the sym9 wavelet based sensing matrix and state-of-the-art random and deterministic sensing matrices.ConclusionsThe result reveals that the proposed sym9 wavelet matrix exhibits the better performance compared to state-of-the-art sensing matrices. Finally, speech quality is evaluated using the MOS, PESQ and the information based measures. The test result confirms that the proposed sym9 wavelet based sensing matrix shows the better MOS and PESQ score indicating the good quality of speech.

Highlights

  • Conventional signal processing methods such as Fourier transform and a short time Fourier transform (STFT) are inadequate for the analysis of non-stationary signals which have abrupt transitions superimposed on the lower frequency backgrounds such as the speech, music and bio-electric signals

  • We have proposed the 1-D discrete wavelet transform (DWT) based sensing matrices for speech signal compression

  • The speech compression is performed using the sensing matrices based on the different DWT families (Donoho et al 2007)

Read more

Summary

Results

The experimental result indicates that the db wavelet based sensing matrix exhibits the better performance compared to other Daubechies wavelet based sensing matrices. The result indicates that the sym wavelet based sensing matrix demonstrates the less reconstruction time and the less relative error, and exhibits the good performance compared to other Symlets wavelet based sensing matrices. We have proposed the DWT based sensing matrices using the Battle, Beylkin and the Vaidyanathan wavelet families. The Beylkin wavelet based sensing matrix demonstrates the less reconstruction time and relative error, and exhibits the good performance compared to the Battle and the Vaidyanathan wavelet based sensing matrices. An attempt was made to find out the best-proposed DWT based sensing matrix, and the result reveals that sym wavelet based sensing matrix shows the better performance among all other proposed matrices. The study demonstrates the performance analysis of the sym wavelet based sensing matrix and state-of-the-art random and deterministic sensing matrices

Conclusions
Introduction
Background
Experimental results and discussion
Random Gaussian Matrix
34. Random Hadamard
16. Symmlet wavelet sym4
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call