Application by Vessels of Logiko-Psychological Methods in Civil and Arbitration Processes

Abstract

One of proof mechanism elements on civil cases are proof methods, many of which treat various scientific spheres. At the same time the speech can go about proof methods which are not put in a procedural form. In this case methods of proof join in the proof mechanism by means of the legal proceedings conducted by participants of evidentiary activity. Object of research of the present article is application dialectic, logical and psychological methods of proof on civil cases. The author investigates use in civil and arbitration processes of methods of similarity and distinction, the accompanying changes, the rest, a ratio of the argument and proof, deduction and induction, belief, questions and answers, and some other.