Abstract
Abstract. Tree-ring archives are one of the main sources of information to reconstruct climate variations over the last millennium with annual resolution. The links between tree-ring proxies and climate have usually been estimated using statistical approaches, assuming linear and stationary relationships. Both assumptions may be inadequate, but this issue can be overcome by ecophysiological modelling based on mechanistic understanding. In this respect, the model MAIDEN (Modeling and Analysis In DENdroecology) simulating tree-ring growth from daily temperature and precipitation, considering carbon assimilation and allocation in forest stands, may constitute a valuable tool. However, the lack of local meteorological data and the limited characterization of tree species traits can complicate the calibration and validation of such a complex model, which may hamper palaeoclimate applications. The goal of this study is to test the applicability of the MAIDEN model in a palaeoclimate context using as a test case tree-ring observations covering the 20th century from 21 Eastern Canadian taiga sites and 3 European sites. More specifically, we investigate the model sensitivity to parameter calibration and to the quality of climatic inputs, and we evaluate the model performance using a validation procedure. We also examine the added value of using MAIDEN in palaeoclimate applications compared to a simpler tree-growth model, i.e. VS-Lite. A Bayesian calibration of the most sensitive model parameters provides good results at most of the selected sites with high correlations between simulated and observed tree growth. Although MAIDEN is found to be sensitive to the quality of the climatic inputs, simple bias correction and downscaling techniques of these data improve significantly the performance of the model. The split-sample validation of MAIDEN gives encouraging results but requires long tree ring and meteorological series to give robust results. We also highlight a risk of overfitting in the calibration of model parameters that increases with short series. Finally, MAIDEN has shown higher calibration and validation correlations in most cases compared to VS-Lite. Nevertheless, this latter model turns out to be more stable over calibration and validation periods. Our results provide a protocol for the application of MAIDEN to potentially any site with tree-ring width data in the extratropical region.
Highlights
Instrumental data inform on past climate only back to the 19th century, because few continuous records exist before this period (Harris et al, 2014; University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit, CRU, 2017)
We want to determine the best set of parameters for MAIDEN at our study sites and test the sensitivity of calibration to the quality of climatic inputs (Sect. 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3)
This experiment could be seen as an alternative method for the validation of the MAIDEN model when the climate and/or tree-ring width observation time series are too short for a split-sample validation
Summary
Instrumental data inform on past climate only back to the 19th century, because few continuous records exist before this period (Harris et al, 2014; University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit, CRU, 2017). J. Rezsöhazy et al.: Application and evaluation of the dendroclimatic process-based model MAIDEN offer a longer-term perspective. Rezsöhazy et al.: Application and evaluation of the dendroclimatic process-based model MAIDEN offer a longer-term perspective In this context, dendroclimatology, defined as the science that allows for the inference of past climates from tree rings, enables climate reconstructions at high temporal resolution (annual) over several centuries or millennia (Fritts, 1976; Hughes et al, 2011). Thanks to the availability of tree-ring observations in many regions, they represent the main data source in most largescale hemispheric reconstructions covering the last millennium
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.