Abstract

In many situations, multi-date image classification improves classification accuracies. However, with improved accuracies comes increased image processing time and effort. This work investigates the circumstances under which multi-date image classification is significantly better than single-date classification using Landsat-5 TM imagery for southeastern New Hampshire. Multiple Landsat images were processed for every three years from 1986 to 2010 and classified using an object-based image analysis approach (OBIA) with a classification and regression tree (CART) technique. Two maps were created for each of the mapping years, one using a single image, and another using multiple images from that year. The multi-date classification process generally performed better than the single-date process. However, the significance of the improvement was primarily dependent on the accuracy of the single-date map. Therefore, if the accuracy of the single-date classification is acceptable, it may not be necessary to perform the multi-date classification.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.