Appendix A

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-G acceleration experienced during launch and re-entry of suborbital spaceflights may present challenges for older or medically susceptible participants. A detailed understanding of the associated physiological responses would support the development of an evidence-based medical approach to commercial suborbital spaceflight.METHODS: There were 24 healthy subjects recruited into ‘younger’ (18-44 yr), ‘intermediate’ (45-64 yr) and ‘older’ (65-80 yr) age groups. Cardiovascular and respiratory variables were measured continuously during dynamic combinations of +Gx (chest-to-back) and +Gz (head-to-foot) acceleration that simulated suborbital G profiles for spaceplane and rocket/capsule platforms. Measurements were conducted breathing air and breathing 15% oxygen to simulate a cabin pressure altitude of 8000 ft.RESULTS: Suborbital G profiles generated highly dynamic changes in heart rate, blood pressure, and cardiac output. G-induced hypoxemia was observed, with minimum arterial oxygen saturation < 80% in a quarter of subjects. Increased age was associated with greater hypoxemia and reduced cardiac output responses but did not have detrimental cardiovascular effects. ECG changes included recurrent G-induced trigeminy in one individual. Respiratory and visual symptoms were common, with 88% of subjects reporting greyout and 29% reporting blackout. There was one episode of G-induced loss of consciousness (G-LOC).DISCUSSION: Suborbital acceleration profiles are generally well tolerated but are not physiologically inconsequential. Marked hemodynamic effects and transient respiratory compromise could interact with predisposing factors to precipitate adverse cardiopulmonary effects in a minority of participants. Medically susceptible individuals may benefit from expanded preflight centrifuge familiarization that includes targeted physiological evaluation in the form of a ‘G challenge test’.Smith TG, Pollock RD, Britton JK, Green NDC, Hodkinson PD, Mitchell SJ, Stevenson AT. Physiological effects of centrifuge-simulated suborbital spaceflight. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2022; 93(12):830–839.