Abstract

IntroductionTreatment of peritoneal metastasis from appendicular adenocarcinoma consists of cyto-reductive surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC). In case of acute appendicular syndrome (AAS) the tumor is likely to be perforated. In that case, there is no treatment recommendation. We propose CRS and HIPEC. Materials and methodWe listed 21 consecutive patients who were addressed for discovery of appendiceal adenocarcinoma. The emergency surgery was performed in a primary-care hospital. We evaluated the therapeutic algorithms, per operative decision, survival and recurrent rate. ResultsAmong the 21 patients, 4 patients were diagnosed as synchronous appendicular peritoneal metastasis, and underwent CRS and HIPEC.The other 17 patients with diagnosis of adenocarcinoma on anatomopathological samples, without peritoneal metastasis during appendectomy, were addressed. Between them 2 patients were denied CRS. Among the 15 operated patients, 8 patients had no peritoneal metastasis discovery during surgery, and therefore underwent prophylactic CRS and HIPEC. Peritoneal metastasis were discovered for the other 7 patients, who also underwent CRS and HIPEC.For the prophylactic group, the recurrence rate is 12,5 %, overall survival (OS) is 100 %.The rate of grade III-IV surgical complications after CRS and HIPEC was 36 % among the 19 patients who underwent surgery. ConclusionIn case of appendectomy in emergency situations for perforated adenocarcinoma, half of the patients may have peritoneal metastasis. In case of non-identified peritoneal metastasis during CRS, performing a prophylactic HIPEC seems to be associated with an encouraging rate of peritoneal disease free situation at 5 years.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call