Abstract

Observations of shear wave anisotropy are key for understanding the mineralogical structure and flow in the mantle. Several researchers have reported the presence of seismic anisotropy in the lowermost 150–250 km of the mantle (i.e., D ′′ layer), based on differences in the arrival times of vertically (S V) and horizontally (S H) polarized shear waves. By computing waveforms at a period > 6 s for a wide range of 1‐D and 3‐D Earth structures, we illustrate that a time shift (i.e., apparent splitting) between S V and S H may appear in purely isotropic simulations. This may be misinterpreted as shear wave anisotropy. For near‐surface earthquakes, apparent shear wave splitting can result from the interference of S with the surface reflection s S. For deep earthquakes, apparent splitting can be due to the S wave triplication in D ′′, reflections off discontinuities in the upper mantle, and 3‐D heterogeneity. The wave effects due to anomalous isotropic structure may not be easily distinguished from purely anisotropic effects if the analysis does not involve full waveform simulations.

Highlights

  • The D” layer — the lowermost 150–250 km of the mantle [Bullen, 1950]— plays a key role in global dynamics

  • We find that models mod9–mod11 with strong velocity discontinuities lead to a clear apparent splitting while models mod4-mod6 and mod12-mod15, with low velocity in the lowermost mantle, cause a widening of the SH waveforms

  • Using 1-D and 3-D waveform simulations, we have demonstrated that phase interference can distort SH and shifts of vertically (SV) waveforms and cause apparent splitting between SH and SV

Read more

Summary

Key Points:

SH-SV splitting for 1-D and 3-D isotropic Earth models. The apparent splitting is due to phase interference between S and reflected waves. SH-SV splitting for 1-D and 3-D isotropic Earth models. The apparent splitting is due to phase interference between S and reflected waves. Anomalous Vs gradients, discontinuities, and heterogeneities may lead to misinterpretation of wave splitting. This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record.

Introduction
Full waveform simulations of deep mantle shear waves
Method’s validation
Effects of earthquake source depth
Apparent splitting for a deep earthquake source
Effects of 1-D velocity structure in the D” layer
Effects of 3-D velocity structure on the apparent splitting
Deep dip-slip source model
Discussion and conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.