Abstract

Two stimuli alternately presented at different locations can evoke a percept of a stimulus continuously moving between the two locations. The neural mechanism underlying this apparent motion (AM) is thought to be increased activation of primary visual cortex (V1) neurons tuned to locations along the AM path, although evidence remains inconclusive. AM masking, which refers to the reduced detectability of stimuli along the AM path, has been taken as evidence for AM-related V1 activation. AM-induced neural responses are thought to interfere with responses to physical stimuli along the path and as such impair the perception of these stimuli. However, AM masking can also be explained by predictive coding models, predicting that responses to stimuli presented on the AM path are suppressed when they match the spatio-temporal prediction of a stimulus moving along the path. In the present study, we find that AM has a distinct effect on the detection of target gratings, limiting the maximum performance at high contrast levels. This masking is strongest when the target orientation is identical to the orientation of the inducers. We developed a V1-like population code model of early visual processing, based on a standard contrast normalization model. We find that AM-related activation in early visual cortex is too small to either cause masking or to be perceived as motion. Our model instead predicts strong suppression of early sensory responses during AM, consistent with the theoretical framework of predictive coding.

Highlights

  • Apparent motion (AM) is a type of illusory motion that can be perceived when two stimuli are presented alternately at two different locations [1]

  • We find that AM-related activation in early visual cortex is too small to either cause masking or to be perceived as motion

  • When the target orientation matched the orientation of the inducers, strong masking was observed during AM

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Apparent motion (AM) is a type of illusory motion that can be perceived when two stimuli are presented alternately at two different locations [1]. Some studies found neurons in primary visual cortex (V1) to respond during AM as if the stimulus was physically present at intermediate locations along the AM path [2, 3]. AM-related V1 responses may be the result of feedback from higher visual areas involved in motion (MT/V5) [4,5,6] or form processing (anterior temporal lobe) [7, 8]. Liu et al [9] failed to find AM-related activity in primary visual cortex during the percept of moving concentric rings. These authors did find increased responses in motion processing areas, suggesting that AM has a late cortical locus. Other studies report a similar lack of activation in V1 [10,11,12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.