Abstract

Background Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) measured using different regions of interest (ROIs) are widely used in differentiating ovarian tumors. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ADCs with different ROIs in differentiating borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) from malignant ovarian tumors (MOTs). Material and Methods Thirty-five BOTs and 54 MOTs who underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were evaluated retrospectively. ADC values were independently measured using five ROI methods: round; rectangle; hot-spot; edge drawing; and five sample ROIs. The inter- and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), one-way analysis of variance, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and unpaired t-tests were used to perform the statistical analyses. Results The measurement reproducibility of the minimum ADC and mean ADC values were good or excellent for BOTs and MOTs (ICC = 0.70–0.95). The minimum and mean ADC value by the edge drawing ROI were significantly higher than those of the other ROI methods (both P < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of the minimum ADC value was less than that of the mean ADC value from the five ROI methods, whereas the AUCs of the mean ADC values from the round ROI and five sample ROIs were significantly larger than those of the other ROI methods ( P < 0.05). The minimum and mean ADC values from the five ROI methods showed significant differences between BOTs and MOTs (all P < 0.05). Conclusion The ROI shape influences the diagnostic performance of ADC value for differentiating BOTs from MOTs. The mean ADC values from the round ROI and five sample ROIs have better diagnostic efficiency.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.