Abstract

BackgroundOur aim was to provide data regarding use of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for distinguishing metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes (LN) in rectal cancer.MethodsMEDLINE library, EMBASE, and SCOPUS database were screened for associations between DWI and metastatic and non-metastatic LN in rectal cancer up to February 2021. Overall, 9 studies were included into the analysis. Number, mean value, and standard deviation of DWI parameters including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of metastatic and non-metastatic LN were extracted from the literature. The methodological quality of the studies was investigated according to the QUADAS-2 assessment. The meta-analysis was undertaken by using RevMan 5.3 software. DerSimonian, and Laird random-effects models with inverse-variance weights were used to account the heterogeneity between the studies. Mean DWI values including 95% confidence intervals were calculated for metastatic and non-metastatic LN.ResultsADC values were reported for 1376 LN, 623 (45.3%) metastatic LN, and 754 (54.7%) non-metastatic LN. The calculated mean ADC value (× 10−3 mm2/s) of metastatic LN was 1.05, 95%CI (0.94, 1.15). The calculated mean ADC value of the non-metastatic LN was 1.17, 95%CI (1.01, 1.33). The calculated sensitivity and specificity were 0.81, 95%CI (0.74, 0.89) and 0.67, 95%CI (0.54, 0.79).ConclusionNo reliable ADC threshold can be recommended for distinguishing of metastatic and non-metastatic LN in rectal cancer.

Highlights

  • Rectal cancer (RC) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer among both men and women in the USA with more than 40,000 cases per year [1]

  • Mean value, and standard deviation of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) parameters including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes (LN) were extracted from the literature

  • The present analysis addressed the important clinical question, whether DWI can aid to diagnose the correct nodal status in RC

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rectal cancer (RC) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer among both men and women in the USA with more than 40,000 cases per year [1]. Previous studies showed that the diameter of benign and malignant nodes in RC was similar, which leads to a low accuracy [5, 6]. Other morphological criteria, such as signal intensity, board margin, and enhancement intensity, did not improve significantly the diagnostic accuracy of metastatic LN in RC [6]. Our aim was to provide data regarding use of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for distinguishing metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes (LN) in rectal cancer. Mean DWI values including 95% confidence intervals were calculated for metastatic and non-metastatic LN. Conclusion No reliable ADC threshold can be recommended for distinguishing of metastatic and non-metastatic LN in rectal cancer

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call