Aplicación de la clasificación de Robson como método útil para estandarizar el manejo del parto. Un ejercicio que reduce la tasa de cesáreas

Abstract

BackgroundCesarean section rate is controversial and the Robson classification is a method for standardizing the evaluation of the causes of cesarean section. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the measures to improve prenatal and intrapartum management implemented after the Robson classification evaluation lead to a decrease in the rate of cesarean sections without increasing the rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity and mortality. Material and methodQuasi-experimental study before-after,between-2019 and 2020, including a total of 2181 patients with delivery at Hospital-Universitario-Valme(1027 patients in Group-2019, and 1154 patients in group-2020).. ResultsWe observed that there was a statistically significant decrease in the cesarean section rate between 2019 and 2020 (21.0% vs 15.8%; p = 0.001) without the decrease being significant in any study subgroup. There was a lower rate of induced labor(29.3% vs 24.6%; p = 0.01), an increased rate of vaginal delivery (79.0% vs 84.2%; p = 0.001), both eutocic and instrumental deliveries (57.9% vs 60.3%; 21% vs 23.9%; p = 0.005) and a statistically significant decrease in the rate of cesarean sections due to failure of induction or non-progression of labor(34.7% vs 20.9%;p = 0.008). In inductions using the balloon-Cook we observed a decrease in the rate of cesarean section (45.3% versus 22.2% p = 0.001). We found a decrease in the percentage of admission to the Neonatal ICU (10.5% vs 7.6%; p = 0.016) and global neonatal morbidity(11.4% vs 8.2%; p = 0.013) without observing a difference in maternal outcomes. ConclusionsThe application of the Robson classification can be a useful method to identify groups that require the application of specific measures aimed at standardizing the management of these patients, thus allowing to reduce the rate of cesarean sections.