Apical Transportation and Centering Ability : A Comparison of Two-Single File Systems after Instrumentation to the Major Foramen and after Overinstrumentation in Curved Root Canals

Abstract

This study was conducted to compare apical transportation and centering ability to the major foramen after instrumentation and overinstrumentation with M-wire Reciproc ® 25 and WaveOne ® primary in severely curved canals of extracted teeth. Thirty mesiobuccal root canals of extracted mandibular and maxillary molars, with a major foramen width less than size 20 and angles of curvatures between 20o and 40o, were prepared with M-wire Reciproc ® 25 or WaveOne ® primary to the foramen and 1 mm beyond the foramen. Digital images of the apical foramen before and after instrumentation and overinstrumentation were taken with a digital camera (Olympus, E330, DC 7.4V) coupled with a microscope (Olympus, CX41, E330, Japan). Each image taken after the instrumentation of the foramen was superimposed on the preliminary image using a CS3 extended Adobe Photoshop program (San Jose, CA, USA). Apical transportation and centering ability were calculated using an AutoCAD program (Autodesk, Software, USA) in the direction of maximum curvature. Repeated measured analyses of variance followed by univariate analyses were conducted. No significant difference was observed after the use of M-wire Reciproc ® 25 or WaveOne ® primary to the working length (P > 0.05). The M-wire Reciproc ® 25 had a higher mean value for transportation and a lower mean value for centering ability (P 0.05). Le M-wire Reciproc ® 25 avait une valeur moyenne plus elevee que le WaveOne® primary pour le transport apical et une valeur moyenne plus faible pour le centrage canalaire (p <0.05), lorsqu’ils sont utilises 1 mm au-dela du foramen. L’utilisation au foramen du M-wire Reciproc ® 25 ou du WaveOne® primary ne presentait aucun danger. Apres surinstrumentation, M-wire Reciproc ® 25 a produit un transport plus eleve du foramen apical que WaveOne® primary.