7-days of FREE Audio papers, translation & more with Prime
7-days of FREE Prime access
7-days of FREE Audio papers, translation & more with Prime
7-days of FREE Prime access
https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2005.074773
Copy DOIJournal: American Journal of Public Health | Publication Date: Sep 29, 2005 |
Citations: 2 |
As past presidents of the American Public Health Association, we were quite surprised to read the commentary coauthored by Dr. Sekiguchi,1 a past president of the American Dental Association (ADA), and ADA staff in the May 2005 American Journal of Public Health opposing the use of dental therapists in rural Alaska.1 This commentary, which was published without an Op-Ed piece, would be comparable to the Journal publishing a commentary from only the American Medical Association in the 1960s stating that there is no need for pilot programs for nurse practitioners, physician assistants, or nurse-midwives, even in high-need areas, and that only physicians should provide health care. I am sure our readers would be quite upset. New Zealand has successfully trained dental therapists for more than 80 years, and many other countries also use them.2 The Alaskan dental therapists are receiving state-of-the-art training, and they are being monitored and evaluated from A to Z.3 Although the ADA has a good track record of supporting preventive measures, such as community water fluoridation and most public health programs, they have a long record of preventing anyone except dentists from providing treatment, even to the underserved. This commentary includes some useful information and correctly documents the array of ongoing efforts of the Indian Health Service and the Tribes to respond to the dental access crisis of Alaskan Natives. However, the authors’ opposition to a pilot program for 6 to 12 dental health therapists without any evidence, data, or studies marginalizes the credibility of the authors and the ADA. Beginning in 1966, the American Public Health Association Governing Council has supported the use of expanded duties at least 3 times.4 This commentary by itself would not normally create much concern; however, because organized dentistry is lobbying state and federal decisionmakers to stop this pilot program, including a full-page ad to the governor in the Juneau Empire newspaper,5 we can not help but think that there was a hidden political agenda for their publication. In these times of dwindling resources, complex access issues, and evidence-based medicine, dentistry, and public health, now is not the time to block innovative programs trying to serve the underserved. Let the Alaskan Natives, a sovereign nation, decide for themselves who can best meet their long-standing, unmet dental needs.
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.