Aortic dissection in women

Abstract

search of theoretical justification. J Am Co/l Cardiol 1987;10:923-929. 5. Hatle L, Angelsen BA, Techn DR. Tramsdal A. Noninvasive assessment of at+ oventricular pressure half-time by Doppler ultrasound. Circulation 1979;60: 1096-I 104. 6. Hatle L. Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of mitral stenosis. Cardiol Clin 1990;8:233-247. 7. Sagar KB, Wann S, Paulson WJH, Lewis S. Role of exercise Doppler echocardiography in isolated mitral stenosis. Chest 1987;92:27-30. 8. Voelker W, Regele B, Dittmann H, Mauser M. lckrath 0, Schmid KM, Karsch KR. Effect of heart rate on transmitral flow velocity profile and Doppler measurements of mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis. Eur Hem-r J l992;13: 152-159. 9. Gonzalez MA, Child JS, Krivokapich I. Comparison of two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography and intracardiac hemodynamics for quantification of mitral stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1987;60:327-332. 10. Braverman AC, Thomas JD, Lee RT. Doppler echocardiographic estimation of mitral valve area during changing hemodynamic conditions. Am J Cardiol 1991;68: I4855 1490. 11. Smith MD, Handshoe R, Kwan OL, DeMaria AN. Comparative accuracy of two-dimensional echocardiography and Doppler pressure half-time methods in assessing severity of mitral stenosis in patients with and without prior commissurotomy. Circulation 1986;73: IOQ-I 10. 12. Chambers J, McLaughlin N, Rapson A, Jackson G. Effect of changes in heart rate on pressure half-time in normally functioning mitral valve prosthesis. Br Hearr J 1988;60:502-506.