Abstract
Evidence from animal and human studies suggests that neuropeptide Y (NPY) may be a potent endogenous anxiolytic. The anatomic structures mediating this action of the peptide remain unknown. Furthermore, in addition to its anxiolytic-like effects, intracerebroventricular administration of NPY induces food intake through hypothalamic mechanisms, making the anxiolytic-like action of the peptide more difficult to interpret. The purpose of this study was to examine the anatomic substrate for the effects of NPY on anxiety, and to characterize the NPY receptors mediating these effects. Intracerebroventricular injection of NPY produced increased food intake in free-feeding animals, and dose-dependent anticonflict/anxiolytic-like effects in an established animal model of anxiety, the Geller-Seifter punished responding test. In contrast, microinjection of NPY into the central nucleus of the amygdala did not increase food intake in free-feeding animals, did not affect unpunished lever pressing for food, but did reproduce the anticonflict/anxiolytic-like effect with high potency. The selective NPY-Y1 agonist, p[Leu31,Pro34]NPY was approximately equipotent with native NPY in the conflict paradigm, and markedly more potent than the Y2 agonist, NPY13-36. Intrastriatal injections had no effect on conflict behavior. Thus, activation of Y1 receptors in the central nucleus of the amygdala produces effects similar to established anxiolytics without affecting food intake, suggesting that Y1-receptors in the amygdala may be a substrate for anxiolytic actions of NPY.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.