Abstract
Reading times were collected to assess the probability and time course of inferences predictive of danger as a function of anxiety. Participants high or low in trait anxiety read (a) context sentences suggesting threat-related or nonthreat outcomes of events, followed by (b) disambiguating sentences in which a target word confirmed or disconfirmed the predicted outcome. The results revealed that low anxiety facilitated processing of nonthreat outcomes, whereas high anxiety facilitated processing of threatening outcomes. Furthermore, these selective effects occurred on a posttarget region of the disambiguating sentence; in contrast, all participants—regardless of anxiety level and threat content of stimuli—showed facilitation when reading the final region of that sentence. These findings indicate that anxiety leads one to prioritize (i. e., increased probability and reduced time) the anticipation of threat-related events.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.