Abstract

A randomized, double-blind, multicenter study (ETV-047) was conducted to evaluate the dose-response relationship of entecavir and compare its antiviral activity and safety with lamivudine in Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). One hundred thirty-seven nucleoside-naive adult patients with CHB were randomized to once-daily oral doses of entecavir 0.01, 0.1, or 0.5mg or lamivudine 100mg for 24weeks. The primary efficacy end point used to evaluate the dose-response relationship was mean change from baseline in serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level at week 22, as determined by polymerase chain reaction assay. Entecavir demonstrated a clear dose-response relationship, with mean change from baseline in serum HBV DNA level of -3.11, -4.77, and -5.16log(10)copies/ml with entecavir 0.01, 0.1, and 0.5mg, respectively. Entecavir 0.5mg was superior to lamivudine 100mg for the mean change in HBV DNA level (-5.16 vs. -4.29log(10)copies/ml; P=0.007). The overall incidence of adverse events was comparable between treatment groups. Two patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events (one with liver cirrhosis [entecavir 0.5mg] and one with grade 4 serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation, nausea, and malaise [lamivudine 100mg]). Serum ALT flares were observed in four patients; flares were associated with 2log(10) reductions or more in HBV DNA level and resolved without dose interruption. Entecavir 0.01-0.5mg is well tolerated and produces a dose-dependent reduction in viral load in nucleoside-naive Japanese patients with CHB. Compared with lamivudine 100mg, entecavir 0.1mg demonstrated noninferiority and entecavir 0.5mg was superior in this population.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.