Abstract
A randomized, double-blind, multicenter study (ETV-047) was conducted to evaluate the dose-response relationship of entecavir and compare its antiviral activity and safety with lamivudine in Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). One hundred thirty-seven nucleoside-naive adult patients with CHB were randomized to once-daily oral doses of entecavir 0.01, 0.1, or 0.5mg or lamivudine 100mg for 24weeks. The primary efficacy end point used to evaluate the dose-response relationship was mean change from baseline in serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level at week 22, as determined by polymerase chain reaction assay. Entecavir demonstrated a clear dose-response relationship, with mean change from baseline in serum HBV DNA level of -3.11, -4.77, and -5.16log(10)copies/ml with entecavir 0.01, 0.1, and 0.5mg, respectively. Entecavir 0.5mg was superior to lamivudine 100mg for the mean change in HBV DNA level (-5.16 vs. -4.29log(10)copies/ml; P=0.007). The overall incidence of adverse events was comparable between treatment groups. Two patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events (one with liver cirrhosis [entecavir 0.5mg] and one with grade 4 serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation, nausea, and malaise [lamivudine 100mg]). Serum ALT flares were observed in four patients; flares were associated with 2log(10) reductions or more in HBV DNA level and resolved without dose interruption. Entecavir 0.01-0.5mg is well tolerated and produces a dose-dependent reduction in viral load in nucleoside-naive Japanese patients with CHB. Compared with lamivudine 100mg, entecavir 0.1mg demonstrated noninferiority and entecavir 0.5mg was superior in this population.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.