Anti‐VEGF and corticosteroids therapy in macular edema secondary to venous occlusions

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To assess the evidence on interventions to improve visual acuity (VA) and to treat macular edema (ME) secondary to central (CRVO) and branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) Methods Recent randomized studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of corticosteroids (triamcinolone, dexamethasone) and anti‐VEGF therapies (ranibizumab). Score study evaluates preservative‐free intravitreal triamcinolone with standard care in BRVO and CRVO. In Geneva study, dexamethasone (DEX) intravitreal implant is compared with sham in BRVO and CRVO. BRAVO and Cruise studies evaluate intraocular injections of ranibizumab in patients with ME following BRVO and CRVO, respectively. Results In SCORE study, there was no difference identified in visual acuity at 12 months for the standard care group compared with the triamcinolone groups in BRVO patients. Intravitreal triamcinolone is superior to observation for treating vision loss associated with ME secondary to CRVO. Improvements in BCVA with DEX implant were seen in patients with BRVO and CRVO, although the patterns of response differed. Intraocular injections of 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg ranibizumab provided rapid, effective treatment for ME following BRVO and CRVO Conclusion Grid photocoagulation remains the standard care for patients with vision loss associated with ME secondary to BRVO. Intravitreal triamcinolone is superior to observation for treating vision loss associated with ME secondary to CRVO. Dexamethasone intravitreal implant can both reduce the risk of vision loss and improve the speed and incidence of visual improvement in eyes with ME secondary to BRVO or CRVO. Anti‐VEGF therapies represent new therapeutical option in the treatment of ME secondary to BRVO and CRVO. Further randomized studies are needed