Antitachycardic Therapy of ICD in Patients with Multiple Morphologies of Monomorphous Ventricular Tachycardia Refractory to Therapy

Abstract

The article presents a description of a clinical case of a patient with structural myocardial pathology (postinfarction cardiosclerosis) with recurrent paroxysmal sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) refractory to the nominal recommended ICD (implantable cardioverter defibrillator) settings; as well as discusses the shortcomings of existing standard algorithms for antitachycardia pacing (ATP) of implantable cardioverter defibrillators and potential ways to increase its efficiency. The refractoriness of recurrent paroxysms of ventricular tachycardia to ATP therapy increases the risk of repeated ICD shocks.
 Despite the existence of universal recommendations for ICD programming and ATP therapy, there is a need in clinical practice for individualized ATP programming in patients refractory to nominal settings. Increasing the number of ATP series and changing algorithms enables to increase the efficiency of ATP up to 8089%. Refractoriness to standard ATP settings may be also overcome by using alternative ATP pacing algorithms (Ramp, Burst-plus, or Ramp-plus instead of Burst), changing the pacing interval, ATP sequence duration, pacing type, and even adding 12 extra stimuli, as well as using data from the previous intracardiac electrophysiological heart test.
 The presented clinical case of a patient with postinfarction cardiosclerosis and paroxysmal stable monomorphic VT (SM-VT) of several morphologies demonstrates that the arrhythmogenic substrate after myocardial infarction changes for a long time without new stenoses in large coronary arteries and without new episodes of acute coronary syndrome, as well as generates several different morphologies of VT from one scar (with different heart rates) and the effect on hemodynamics. The efficiency of early ATP pacing may differ for VT of various morphologies, which makes it reasonable to use alternative pacing algorithms (in addition to the standard Burst sequences recommended by the 2019 Consensus on ICD programming) and testing possible ATP algorithms during ablation of monomorphic VT, including during preventive VT ablation before ICD implantation.