Abstract

Double Object Construction in Zarma sometimes allows alternations in the order of its internal arguments and the order in some cases may also be fixed. This tendency does not make predictions about a canonical order for the occurrence of Theme and Recipient objects within the VP simple. The same condition applies to monotransitive structures which vary between a complement-head and a head-complement order. It is the aim of this paper to present and analyse the most salient features of the kind of variations found in Zarma word order, particularly the ones associated with the verb that encodes three-participant events. The paper adopts the minimalist program proposed by Chomsky and is complemented with the Antisymmetry Hypothesis proposed by Kayne (1994). The study shows that the language has a uniform linear order where the recipient canonically precedes the theme on the basis of animacy factor. This is particularly common with the pronoun as the recipient in double object structures. Employing different diagnostics, the paper concludes that the recipient only follows the theme when the theme is associated with a more prominent discourse status. It is also argued that asymmetric C-command always occurs between the theme and the recipient. It implies that the language symmetry is altered by movement to designated positions for the purpose of feature checking.

Highlights

  • Double object construction is a typical three-argument structure while a monotransitive construction is a two-argument structure

  • The potency of the foregoing analysis is handled by the SplitVP hypothesis known as the VP-shell or Light-verb popularized by Chomsky (1995). We adopt this hypothesis to treat the double object construction that we focus in this article

  • We have tried to explain the alternations found in the position of verb and its internal argument in Zarma monotransitive constructions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Double object construction is a typical three-argument structure while a monotransitive construction is a two-argument structure. At the surface structure level, the position of the verb relative to its argument(s) in Zarma is not fixed in both monotransitive and double object constructions. Information about Double Object Constructions is uncommon in the language. Paying attention to this construction type will bring out its formal properties. It is not likely that recipient-theme and theme-recipient orders in double object constructions are alternative choices in the language. Our assumption here takes into consideration the likely specific or formal properties of monotransitive and double object constructions in Zarma.

Theoretical Framework
Object Verb Order in Mono-argument Structures
Auxiliated Object Verb Order
E Kadi kàrù
D Fati gòó zàárà yúnú
PROG:NEG rice eat
C Áí dè kòròfó
B Áí sómbú nòòró
Emphasis as a Trigger for OV Order
Analyzing the OV Order in Monotransitive Constructions
Word Order in Simple Double Object Constructions
B Áí sì nòòrú nó Zainabou
B Abou nòòrú nó Kadi sè
Imperative and Double Object Constructions
C Nó nòòrú
B Màsí nòòrú
Pronoun and Double Object Constructions
B Akeem hàní bónkàrè nó áí sè
B Akeem nà ǹgá bòùn nó nòòrú
VP-Shells and Double Object Constructions
Case in Double Object Constructions
B Zainabou nà
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call