Abstract

Relationships between distinct antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence patterns and risk of drug resistance are not well understood. We conducted a nested case-control analysis within a longitudinal cohort study of individuals initiating efavirenz-based ART. Primary outcomes of interest, measured at 6 and 12months after treatment initiation, were: 1) virologic suppression, 2) virologic failure with resistance, and 3) virologic failure without resistance. Our primary exposure of interest was ART adherence, measured over the 6months before each visit with electronic pill monitors, and categorized in three ways: 1) 6months average adherence; 2) running adherence, defined as the proportion of days with average adherence over 9days of less than or equal to 10%, 20%, and 30%; and 3) number of 3-, 7-, and 28-day treatment gaps in the prior 6months. We analyzed data from 166 individuals (107 had virologic failure during observation and 59 had virologic suppression at 6 and 12months). Average adherence was higher among those with virologic suppression (median 83%, IQR 58-96%) versus those with virologic failure with resistance (median 35%, IQR 20-77%, pairwise P < 0.01) and those with virologic failure without resistance (median 21%, IQR 2-54%, pairwise P < 0.01). Although treatment gaps generally predicted virologic failure (P < 0.01), they did not differentiate failure with and without drug resistance (P > 0.6). Average adherence patterns, but not the assessed frequency of treatment gaps, differentiated failure with versus without drug resistance among individuals initiating efavirenz-based ART. Future work should explore adherence-resistance relationships for integrase inhibitor-based regimens.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call