Abstract

Hyperprolactinemia has been found in a subset of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. In order to explore whether antibodies to prolactin (PRL) play a role in SLE patients with associated hyperprolactinemia, we performed a cross-sectional study in which 259 consecutive SLE patients were tested for hyperprolactinemia and anti-prolactin autoantibodies. Forty-one (15.8%) had prolactin levels above the norm. The frequency of anti-PRL autoantibodies in hyperprolactinemia was 2/14 (14.3%). In the SLE patients with 'idiopathic hyperprolactinemia', 11/27 (40.7 %) had anti-PRL antibodies. The levels of serum PRL were significantly higher in patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia and anti-PRL autoantibody compared to the patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia who were anti-PRL autoantibody-negative. Patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia and anti-PRL autoantibody had relatively low SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) scores and significantly different laboratory parameters compared to those with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia and no anti-PRL antibody. There was a significant correlation between titers of the anti-PRL autoantibody and serum PRL levels (rs = 0.98, P = 0.0001). These data suggest that anti-PRL antibodies could be the cause of hyperprolactinemia in a subset of SLE patients, especially those with particularly high serum prolactin levels with a diagnosis of 'idiopathic hyperprolactinemia'. The patients with anti-PRL antibody had fewer clinical manifestations and less serological activity, indicating that biological activity of PRL was attenuated by the autoantibody.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call