Abstract

Some animals, such as the bombardier beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Brachinini), have evolved chemical defences against predators. When attacked, bombardier beetles can discharge noxious chemicals at temperatures of approximately 100 °C from the tip of their abdomens, “bombing” their attackers. Although many studies to date have investigated how bombardier beetles discharge defensive chemicals against predators, relatively little research has examined how predators modify their attacks on bombardier beetles to avoid being bombed. In this study, I observed the black-spotted pond frog Pelophylax nigromaculatus (Anura: Ranidae) attacking the bombardier beetle Pheropsophus jessoensis under laboratory conditions. In Japan, Pe. nigromaculatus is a generalist predator in grasslands where the bombardier beetle frequently occurs. Almost all the frogs (92.9%) observed rejected live bombardier beetles; 67.9% stopped their attacks once their tongues touched the beetles, and 25.0% spat out the beetles immediately after taking the beetles into their mouths. No beetle bombed a frog before being taken into a frog’s mouth. All beetles taken into mouths bombed the frogs. Only 7.1% of the frogs swallowed live bombardier beetles after being bombed in the mouth. When dead beetles were provided instead, 85.7% of the frogs rejected the dead beetles, 71.4% stopped their attacks after their tongues touched the beetles, and 14.3% spat out the beetles. Only 14.3% of the frogs swallowed the dead beetles. The results suggest that the frogs tended to stop their predatory attack before receiving a bombing response from the beetles. Therefore, bombing was not essential for the beetles to successfully defend against the frogs. Using its tongue, Pe. nigromaculatus may be able to rapidly detect a deterrent chemical or physical characteristics of its potential prey Ph. jessoensis and thus avoid injury by stopping its predatory attack before the beetle bombs it.

Highlights

  • Physical and chemical defences have evolved in many organisms to protect against natural enemies (Edmunds, 1974; Eisner, Eisner & Siegler, 2005)

  • This study aims to investigate the responses of the black-spotted pond frog Pelophylax nigromaculatus (Hallowell) (Anura: Ranidae) to the defensive behaviour of the bombardier beetle Pheropsophus jessoensis (Morawitz)

  • Of the frogs that took the beetles into their mouths, 88.9% (n = 8/9) initially stopped attacking the beetles when their tongues first touched the beetles, but resumed their predatory attack soon thereafter

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Physical and chemical defences have evolved in many organisms to protect against natural enemies (Edmunds, 1974; Eisner, Eisner & Siegler, 2005). Adult bombardier beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Brachinini) bomb, i.e., discharge noxious chemicals from the tip of their abdomens at temperatures of approximately 100 ◦C, when they are disturbed or attacked (Aneshansley et al, 1969; Dean, 1979; Eisner, 2003; Eisner, Eisner & Siegler, 2005; Arndt et al, 2015). Such ejection of hot chemicals is only known in the coleopteran family Carabidae. Further research is needed to clarify the relative importance of chemical toxicity and heat for overall successful anti-predatory defence

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call