Anti-phospholipid antibodies do not predict damage in SLE patients in the 21st century-an observational study from the Lupus-Cruces cohort.

Abstract

To compare the influence of aPLs on global and cardiovascular damage in patients with SLE diagnosed before and after the year 2000. Two hundred and eighty-six patients from the Lupus-Cruces cohort with a minimum follow-up of 5 years were divided into two subcohorts according to the date of diagnosis, before 2000 (less than 2000) and from 2000 on (2000 or more). We compared the mean Systemic Lupus Erythematosus International Collaborating Clinics-American College of Rheumatology (SLICC-ACR) Damage Index score and global and cardiovascular damage-free survival rates in the presence or absence of aPL in both subcohorts. Variables potentially modulating damage among aPL-positive patients were analysed. The subcohorts were comparable for demographic and lupus-related variables except for treatment variables: the 2000 or more subcohort received lower doses of prednisone and more HCQ, low-dose aspirin, statins, immunosuppressive agents and vitamin D. aPL-positive patients in the less than 2000, but not in the 2000 or more subcohort, accrued more damage compared with aPL-negative patients. In the less than 2000 subcohort, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for global and cardiovascular damage in aPL-positive vs aPL-negative patients were 1.98 (95% CI 1.24, 3.14) and 9.3 (95% CI 3.24, 26.92), respectively. No differences in damage were seen between aPL-positive and aPL-negative patients in the 2000 or more subcohort. Hypertension (HR = 4.64, 95% CI 1.33, 16.19), LA (HR = 3.85, 95% CI 1.1, 13.41) and the number of months on HCQ (HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.95, 0.99) were independent predictors of vascular damage in the combined analysis of all aPL-positive patients. The effects of aPL on damage accrual in SLE patients have been reduced over recent years. The widespread use of HCQ and a better thromboprophylaxis are likely causing this change.