Antiphospholipid antibodies as potential prognostic indicators of recurrent ischemic stroke

Abstract

BackgroundImmunity play a pivotal role in the risk of ischemic stroke, and studies have also shown a relationship between ischemic stroke and autoimmune diseases. In light of this we conducted a prospective cohort study to elucidate the impact of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs), antinuclear antibodies (ANA), and anti-extractable nuclear antigen autoantibodies (anti-ENA) on the prognosis of ischemic stroke. Methods245 stroke patients were recruited in this single-center study and followed up with for 3 years. Autoantibodies, including aPLs (ACA, anti-β2GPI, LA), ANA and anti-ENA were evaluated in recurrent ischemic stroke (RIS) and nonrecurrent ischemic stroke (nonRIS). Stroke severity was judged using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). For preventive treatment, 42 IS patients with positive aPLs + ANA/anti-ENA were randomized 1:1 into a hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) treatment group and a control group, and the prognoses were compared. ResultsThe positive rate of ACA IgG (p = 0.018), anti-β2GPI IgG (p = 0.047), LA (p = 0.023), and aPLs + ANA/anti-ENA (p = 0.000) were significantly higher in patients with RIS compared to patients with nonRIS, and aPLs + ANA/anti-ENA (HR2.31, 95 % CI1.02-5.25, p = 0.046) and hypertension (HR2.50, 95 % CI1.17-5.35, p = 0.018) were the independent risk factors of recurrence. There were differences in NIHSS at month 36 between those positive and negative for aPLs + ANA/anti-ENA (p = 0.001, Eta2 = 0.052), anti-ENA (p = 0.016, Eta2 = 0.030), ANA (p = 0.035, Eta2 = 0.022), and LA (p = 0.016, Eta2 = 0.028). Furthermore, the recurrence rate of the HCQ treatment group was lower than that of the control group (p = 0.024). ConclusionsCo-positivity of aPLs and ANA/anti-ENA is an independent risk factor for RIS. However, HCQ therapy may reduce the recurrence rate of IS for these patients.