Abstract

In this laboratory research, we produced and compared different phenol extracts from olive-oil mill wastewaters. The extracts and sample preparation was as follows: 1 CW-Acetone (wastewater, previously centrifuged and treated with acetone to precipitate colloid substances); 2 CW-Ac-HCl-EtAc (this extract was recovered by ethyl acetate from the 1 CW-Acetone prior to being hydrolysed by 1N HCL at 80 °C for 1 h); 3.2 CW-20% MetOH and 4.2 CW-80% MetOH (fractions separated by solid-liquid extraction (SPE) with methanol:water mixtures at 20% and 80% (v/v), respectively).Determined in each sample were: (i) total phenols and ortho -di-phenol conducive to spectrophotometric methods; (ii) phenol composition by HPLC analysis and finally, (iii) antioxidant activity on a lard sample, using rancimat test under 120 °C temperature and 20 l h −1 air flow. The extract 1 CW-Acetone, composed essentially of local wastewater phenols, was less effective than the other extracts. Best antioxidant extract was 3.2 CW-20% MetOH that prolonged the lard’s oxidative stability 3.5 and 7.0 times at doses of 100 and 200 mg kg −1 , respectively. Antioxidant effectiveness of the various extracts were found to be directly correlating with percentage of free hydroxytyrosol. Finally, antioxidant properties of olive-oil mill wastewater extract samples was found to be the result of their phenol composition rather than their phenol content.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.