Abstract
Abstract This paper investigates the degree to which Antiochus III’s treatment of Jerusalem conforms to a common Seleucid model. It develops this through a comparison with the same king’s treatment of Sardis in 213 BCE. It then attempts to identify a local cultural script deployed by the Seleucid court in its conquest of Judea. The paper concludes by raising some broader methodological questions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
