Antimicrobial use in household, semi-industrialized, and industrialized pig and poultry farms in Viet Nam

Abstract

The use and misuse of antimicrobials in livestock production contributes to increasing antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Antimicrobial use (AMU), has been identified as a problem in Viet Nam. There were many identified drivers of AMU in Viet Nam such as lack of access to veterinary services, easy access to cheap over-the-counter antimicrobials, and insufficient farm biosecurity. This study included chicken farmers (n = 540) and pig farmers (n = 540) from household, semi-industrialized, and industrialized farms in the North, Central, and South of Viet Nam. The objective of this study was to determine farmers rationale behind AMU on their farms and their usage patterns. On pig farms, 98.1% of the farmers reported use of antimicrobials in their production. On chicken farms, 87.9% reported use of antimicrobials in their production. The results of the survey showed that the three main purposes of AMU were treatment of sick animals, disease prevention, and weight gain. Treatment accounted for 81.3% in pig farming and 62.1% in chicken farming. The main reason to start antimicrobial therapy in pig and chicken production was observation of the first clinical signs of disease (73.9% of the pig farmers and 74.9% of chicken farmers). The proportion of industrial pig farms performing diagnostic tests before using antimicrobials was singnificantly (p < 0.05) higher than household farms (OR = 45.3). The proportion of chicken farmers who used diagnostic tests before using antimicrobials on semi-industrial (OR = 4.1) and industrial farms (OR = 26.7) were significantly higher compared with household farms. Through encouraging the prudent use of antimicrobials in animal husbandry we can reduce the use of antimicrobials at the primary production level and thereby lowering the risk of AMR.