Antimicrobial resistance patterns among aerobic Gram-negative bacilli isolated from patients in intensive care units: results of a multicenter study in Russia

Abstract

ObjectiveTo determine the antimicrobial resistance patterns among aerobic Gram-negative bacilli isolated from patients in intensive care units (ICUs) in different parts of Russia.MethodsDuring 1995–96, 10 Russian hospitals from different geographic areas were asked to submit 100 consecutive Gram-negative isolates from patients with ICU-acquired infections. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 12 antimicrobials were determined by Etest and results were interpreted according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) guidelines.ResultsIn total, 1005 non-duplicate strains were obtained from 863 patients. The most common species were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (28.8%), Escherichia coli (21.4%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (16.7%), Proteus mirabilis (9.7%), Enterobacter spp. (8.2%) and Acinetobacter spp. (7.7%). High levels of resistance were seen to second- and third-generation cephalosporins, ureidopenicillins, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and gentamicin. The most active agents were imipenem (no resistance in Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Enterobacter spp. and Acinetobacter spp., 7% resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa), amikacin (7% resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., 4% in Enterobacter spp., 1% in Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis, no resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae) and ciprofloxacin (15% resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 5% in Enterobacter spp. and Proteus mirabilis, 2% in Klebsiella pneumoniae, 1% in Escherichia coli).ConclusionsSecond- and third-generation cephalosporins, ureidopenicillins, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and gentamicin cannot be considered as reliable drugs for empirical monotherapy for aerobic Gram-negative infections in ICUs in Russia. To determine the antimicrobial resistance patterns among aerobic Gram-negative bacilli isolated from patients in intensive care units (ICUs) in different parts of Russia. During 1995–96, 10 Russian hospitals from different geographic areas were asked to submit 100 consecutive Gram-negative isolates from patients with ICU-acquired infections. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 12 antimicrobials were determined by Etest and results were interpreted according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) guidelines. In total, 1005 non-duplicate strains were obtained from 863 patients. The most common species were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (28.8%), Escherichia coli (21.4%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (16.7%), Proteus mirabilis (9.7%), Enterobacter spp. (8.2%) and Acinetobacter spp. (7.7%). High levels of resistance were seen to second- and third-generation cephalosporins, ureidopenicillins, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and gentamicin. The most active agents were imipenem (no resistance in Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Enterobacter spp. and Acinetobacter spp., 7% resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa), amikacin (7% resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., 4% in Enterobacter spp., 1% in Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis, no resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae) and ciprofloxacin (15% resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 5% in Enterobacter spp. and Proteus mirabilis, 2% in Klebsiella pneumoniae, 1% in Escherichia coli). Second- and third-generation cephalosporins, ureidopenicillins, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and gentamicin cannot be considered as reliable drugs for empirical monotherapy for aerobic Gram-negative infections in ICUs in Russia.