Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance is a threat to global health, aggravated by the use of antimicrobials in livestock production. Mitigating the growing economic costs related to antimicrobial use in livestock production requires strong global coordination, and to that end policy makers can leverage global and national food animal trade policies, such as bans and user fees. Evaluation of such policies requires representing the interactions between competing producers in the global meat market, which is usually out of the scope of statistical models. For that, we developed a game-theoretic food system model of global livestock production and trade between 18 countries and aggregate world regions. The model comprises the largest producing and consuming countries, the explicit interconnections between countries, and the use of antimicrobials in food animal production. Our model allows us to provide policy insights beyond standard literature and assess the trade-off between trade, cost of a policy, and antimicrobials-induced productivity. We studied three scenarios: global increased user fees on antimicrobials, a global ban of meat imports from Brazil, and a decrease in China's meat consumption. We found that a user fee that increases the price of antimicrobials by 50% globally leads to a 33% reduction in global antimicrobial use. However, participation of developing and emerging countries in the coordination scheme is jeopardized, since they become less competitive for meat sales compared to developed countries. When meat imports from Brazil are banned globally, importers of Brazil's meat would turn primarily to the U.S. to supplement their demand. Lastly, meeting China's medium-term lower meat consumption target would not affect global antimicrobial use, but could increase China's antimicrobial use by 11%. We highlighted the importance of trade for the outcome of a policy and concluded that global cooperation is required to align the incentives of all countries toward tackling antimicrobial resistance.

Highlights

  • Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a threat to global health, accounting for over 700,000 deaths each year (O’Neill, 2014)

  • Following Van Boeckel et al (2017), we examined the impact of a uniform country-level user fee on antimicrobial used in the livestock sector that would gradually increase the price of antimicrobials by 50% by 2028

  • The model output showed that a user fee which increased the price of antimicrobials uniformly by 50% and was adopted by all countries led to a 33% decrease in global antimicrobial use in 2028 and a negligible decrease in global production

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a threat to global health, accounting for over 700,000 deaths each year (O’Neill, 2014). The treatment options for a patient who is infected by a resistant microbial pathogen are either unavailable or would require healthcare providers to use less effective treatment methods. Infection by a resistant microbial pathogen can complicate the recovery of vulnerable patients from complex surgeries (CDC, 2013). This disease burden is predicted to contribute toward 10 million global deaths by 2050 (O’Neill, 2014). Global procurement of antimicrobials in the animal sector related to livestock production is estimated to be 73–100% higher than the purchases for the human health sector (Van Boeckel et al, 2017). Excessive antimicrobial use could reflect unsanitary breeding conditions (Martin et al, 2015) or the use of antimicrobials as a means to increase global livestock production to meet consumer demand

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.