Abstract
This study compared the antibacterial effect of 2% clindamycin and 2% and 100% concentration of triple antibiotic paste (TAP) on an Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. Dentinal tubules of 100 root specimens were infected and randomly assigned to five groups. A total of 1000mgmL-1 of TAP, 20mgmL-1 of TAP and clindamycin, calcium hydroxide or methylcellulose (control) were placed in the root canal for 1week. After treatment, dentine shavings were collected from 200 and 400μm dentine depth and the number of colony-forming units (CFU) per mg was determined. Reduction in viable bacteria in first three groups was significantly better than calcium hydroxide and control groups. However, the antimicrobial effectiveness among these three groups was not significantly different from each other. There was no significant difference between data at 200 and 400μm in all groups except the Ca(OH)2 group. The antibiofilm effect of clindamycin was comparable with TAP, so it may be used instead of TAP.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
