Abstract

Anti-gliadin antibodies (AGA) occur in approximately 10% of the general population, produced as a response to gluten. Autoimmune gluten-related disorders can have detrimental neurological effects if not properly controlled but the relevance of such "incidental" AGA is not properly established; any harm caused would indicate the gluten-free diet as a means for affected people to protect their brain health. We explored this question by comparing brain MRI scanning, cognitive testing and other measures between healthy volunteers with and without AGA. Healthy volunteers aged 50-70 (without celiac disease, on a gluten-containing diet) underwent blood testing to confirm AGA status. Any AGA+ subjects were matched to AGA- controls on age, sex, BMI, level of education, hypertension diagnosis and smoking history. These subgroups underwent a cognitive test battery, quality-of-life (QoL) surveys and brain MRI scanning. Groups were compared between all outcome measures. Secondary analyses correlated AGA titre with outcomes across the whole cohort. Groupwise comparisons of cognitive, QoL and MRI studies were all negative. Repeating these analyses as correlations with AGA titre across the cohort, a single significant result was found concerning the error rate on the subtle cognitive impairment test, in a direction indicating increased IgG AGA to predict worse performance. This did not survive multiple comparisons correction. Our analysis is the most comprehensive to date and utilises a number of outcome measures known to be sensitive to subtle shifts in neurophysiology and cognition. Incidental AGA does not appear to be associated with any indications of neuropsychological deficit.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.